Skip to main content

Councillor conduct


Information on the governance of the council including the local complaints process in relation to elected members and parish Councillors.

This section gives information on the standards the council work to, to ensure we provide quality services to our residents, businesses and visitors.

Code of conduct

Details of the code of conduct adopted by North East Lincolnshire Council and town and parish councils within the Borough.

The council has adopted a code of conduct which applies to all elected and co-opted members of the Council, as required by section 27 of the Localism Act 2011. The code sets out rules which must be complied with by all members. The rules are there to ensure members act properly and lawfully at all times.

Town and parish Councillors in the Borough are also required to observe a code of conduct. All town and parish councils within North East Lincolnshire have adopted the same code of conduct as North East Lincolnshire Council.

The standards committee is responsible for considering complaints that an elected member has breached the code of conduct. Further information on the complaints process is below.

Download the Code of conduct (PDF, 207KB) .

Dealing with standards allegations

Details of the complaints process for elected members of North East Lincolnshire Council and town and parish Councillors within the Borough.

These arrangements set out how to make a complaint that an elected or co-opted member of this council or of a parish or town council in the area has failed to comply with the code of conduct, and sets out how the council will deal with allegations of a failure to comply with the code of conduct.

Under Sections 28(6) and (7) of the Localism Act 2011, the council must have in place arrangements under which allegations that a member or co-opted member of the council or of a parish or town council in the area has failed to comply with the code of conduct can be investigated and decisions made on such allegations.

Such arrangements must provide for the council to appoint at least one independent person whose views must be sought by the council before it takes a decision on an allegation which it has decided shall be investigated, and whose views can be sought by the council at any other stage, or by a member or co-opted member of a parish or town council in the area against whom an allegation has been made.

For complaints concerning members of parish and town councils, where those members are not also members of North East Lincolnshire Council, ordinarily the monitoring officer will assess such complaints against the local assessment criteria and, after consultation with the independent person, take a decision as to whether a formal investigation is merited.

The monitoring officer may, however, in his discretion refer complaints to the referrals panel to assess where he feels it reasonable and appropriate to do so such as where the monitoring officer has had prior involvement in the complaint.

For complaints concerning members of North East Lincolnshire Council (or where the monitoring officer has exercised his discretion to refer a parish and town council related complaint) either in their capacity as parish or town council members or as members of the Council, the referrals panel will be convened to assess whether the complaint should be investigated. In considering the matter, the referrals panel shall consult and consider the views of the independent person and apply the local assessment criteria.

Decisions on whether a complaint will be investigated will normally be taken within 28 days of receipt of the complaint. A formal notice of decision will be issued in each case. The decision of the monitoring officer or referrals panel is final and is not subject to a right of appeal.

Where the monitoring officer or the referrals panel requires additional information in order to come to a decision, you may be contacted to provide such further information, as may the Member against whom your complaint is directed.

Where your complaint relates to a member of a parish or town council, the monitoring officer may also inform the clerk of the parish or town council concerned of your complaint and seek the views of the parish or town council before deciding whether the complaint merits formal investigation

In appropriate cases, the monitoring officer or the referrals panel may seek to resolve the complaint informally, without the need for a formal investigation. Such informal resolution may involve the member accepting that his/her conduct was unacceptable and offering an apology, or other remedial action by the council. Where the member concerned makes a reasonable offer of local resolution but you are not willing to accept that offer, the monitoring officer or the referrals panel will take this into account in deciding whether the complaint merits formal investigation.

Councillor conduct complaint form

Complaint investigations

For complaints concerning members of parish and town councils, where those members are not also members of North East Lincolnshire Council, ordinarily the monitoring officer will assess such complaints against the local assessment criteria and, after consultation with the independent person, take a decision as to whether a formal investigation is merited.

The monitoring officer may, however, in his discretion refer complaints to the referrals panel to assess where he feels it reasonable and appropriate to do so such as where the monitoring officer has had prior involvement in the complaint.

For complaints concerning members of North East Lincolnshire Council (or where the monitoring officer has exercised his discretion to refer a parish and town council related complaint) either in their capacity as parish or town council members or as members of the council, the referrals panel will be convened to assess whether the complaint should be investigated. In considering the matter, the referrals panel shall consult and consider the views of the independent person and apply the local assessment criteria.

Decisions on whether a complaint will be investigated will normally be taken within 28 days of receipt of the complaint. A formal notice of decision will be issued in each case. The decision of the monitoring officer or referrals panel is final and is not subject to a right of appeal.

Where the monitoring officer or the referrals panel requires additional information in order to come to a decision, you may be contacted to provide such further information, as may the Member against whom your complaint is directed.

Where your complaint relates to a member of a parish or town council, the monitoring officer may also inform the clerk of the parish or town council concerned of your complaint and seek the views of the parish or town council before deciding whether the complaint merits formal investigation

In appropriate cases, the monitoring officer or the referrals panel may seek to resolve the complaint informally, without the need for a formal investigation. Such informal resolution may involve the member accepting that his/her conduct was unacceptable and offering an apology, or other remedial action by the council. Where the member concerned makes a reasonable offer of local resolution but you are not willing to accept that offer, the monitoring officer or the referrals panel will take this into account in deciding whether the complaint merits formal investigation.

How investigations are conducted

The council has adopted a procedure for the investigation of complaints.

If the monitoring officer or assessment panel decides that a complaint merits formal investigation, the monitoring officer will appoint an investigating officer, who may be another officer of the council, an officer of another council or an external investigator. The investigating officer will decide whether he/she needs to meet or speak to you to understand the nature of your complaint and so that you can explain your understanding of events and suggest what documents the investigating officer needs to see, and who the investigating officer needs to interview.

The investigating officer would normally, subject to any ruling on disclosure, write to the member against whom you have complained and provide him/her with a full copy of your complaint, and ask the member to provide his/her explanation of events, and to identify what documents the investigating officer needs to see and who he/she needs to interview.

At the end of his/her investigation, the investigating officer will produce a draft report and will send copies of that draft report, in confidence, to you and to the member concerned to give you both an opportunity to identify any matter in that draft report which you disagree with or which you consider requires more consideration.

Having received and taken account of any comments which you may make on the draft report, the investigating officer will send his/her final report to the monitoring officer.

It should be noted that at any time during an investigation, the investigating officer may, following consultation with the independent person, refer the matter back to the referrals panel for re-consideration as to whether the investigation should proceed if the investigating officer considers that the re-consideration criteria are satisfied.

There is no right of appeal for you as complainant or for the member against a decision of the monitoring officer, the assessment panel or the hearings panel.

If you feel that the council has failed to deal with your complaint in accordance with these arrangements, you may make a complaint to the Local Government Ombudsman.

If there is evidence that the code of conduct has not been met the monitoring officer will review the investigating officer’s report.

After consulting the independent person they will consider whether local resolution should be attempted or the matter proceed direct to hearing before the hearings panel.

If the monitoring officer considers that local resolution is not appropriate or you are not satisfied by the proposed resolution, or the member concerned does not accept that the matter should be resolved in such a manner, then the monitoring officer will report the investigating officer’s report to the hearings panel which will conduct a hearing before deciding whether the member has failed to comply with the code of conduct and, if so, whether to take any action in respect of the failure.

In readiness for the convening of the hearings panel, the monitoring officer will conduct a written “pre-hearing process”, requiring the member concerned to give their response to the investigating officer’s report in order to identify what is likely to be agreed and what is likely to be in contention at the hearing.

If, through the “pre-hearing process”, the member concerned accepts the investigating officer’s report, they will be given the opportunity to provide a statement of mitigation which they may invite the hearings panel to consider in their absence. Alternatively, they may elect to attend a hearings panel to present their mitigation. In either case, the ‘uncontested’ hearing procedure will be followed.

Where, following the “pre-hearing process”, the investigating officer’s report remains in contention, the matter will be set down for a ‘contested’ hearing before the hearings panel. The ‘contested’ hearing procedure will be followed. In essence, at the hearing, the investigating officer will present his/her report, call such witnesses as he/she considers necessary and make representations to substantiate his/her conclusion that the member has failed to comply with the code of conduct. For this purpose, the investigating officer may ask you, as the complainant, to attend and give evidence to the hearings panel. Unless called to do so by the investigating officer, you do not have the right to address the hearings panel of your own volition. The member will then have an opportunity to give his/her evidence, to call witnesses and to make representations to the hearings panel as to why he/she considers that he/she did not fail to comply with the code of conduct. The member may be legally represented at the hearings panel.

The hearings panel, with the benefit of any advice from the independent person, may conclude that the member did not fail to comply with the code of conduct and so dismiss the complaint. If the hearings panel concludes that the member did fail to comply with the code of conduct, the Chair will inform the member of this finding and the hearings panel will then consider what action, if any, the hearings panel should recommend as a result of the member’s failure to comply with the code of conduct. In doing this, the hearings panel will give the member an opportunity to make representations to the panel and will consult the independent person but will then decide what action, if any, to take in respect of the matter.

The council has delegated to the hearings panel such of its powers to take action in respect of individual members as may be necessary to promote and maintain high standards of conduct. Accordingly, the hearings panel may do the following:

  • write to the member over their conduct
  • publish its findings in the local media in respect of the member’s conduct
  • report its findings to the council or to the parish or town council concerned
  • recommend to the member’s group leader (or in the case of un-grouped members, recommend to the council or to committees) that he/she be removed from any or all committees or sub-committees of the council
  • recommend to the leader of the council that the member be removed from the cabinet or removed from particular portfolio responsibilities
  • instruct the monitoring officer to, or recommend to the parish or town council concerned, that it arrange training for the member
  • recommend removal, or recommend to the parish or town council concerned, removal of the member from all outside appointments to which he/she has been appointed or nominated by the council or the parish or town council
  • withdraw, or recommend to the parish or town council concerned, that it withdraws facilities provided to the member by the council, such as a computer, website and/or email and internet access
  • exclude, or recommend to the parish or town council concerned, that it excludes the member from the council’s offices or other premises with the exception of meeting rooms as necessary for attending council, committee and sub-committee meetings

The hearings panel has no power to suspend or disqualify the member or to withdraw a member’s basic allowance or any special responsibility allowances.

At the end of the hearing, the Chair will state the decision of the hearings panel as to whether the member has failed to comply with the code of conduct and as to any action which the hearings panel resolves to take.

As soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, the monitoring officer shall prepare a formal decision notice in consultation with the Chair of the hearings panel and send a copy to you, to the member and to any parish and town council concerned and make such decision notice available for public inspection and report the decision to the next convenient meeting of the standards committee.

The decision of the hearings panel is final and is not subject to a right of appeal.

The referrals panel and the hearings panel are sub-committees of the council’s standards committee. The standards committee has decided that each of those panels will comprise a maximum of three elected members of the council’s standards committee. Co-opted, non-voting (parish council) members of the standards committee may be asked to sit on such panels.

The independent person is invited to attend all meetings of the referrals panel and the hearings panel and his/her views are sought and taken into consideration before the monitoring officer or referrals panel takes any decision on whether a complaint should be investigated. The hearings panel will seek the independent person’s views on whether a member’s conduct constitutes a failure to comply with the code of conduct and as to any action to be taken following a finding of failure to comply with the code of conduct.

The independent person is a person who has applied for the post following advertisement of a vacancy for the post and is then appointed by a positive vote from a majority of all the members of the council.

A person cannot be “independent” if he/she –

11.1 Is, or has been within the past five years, a member, co-opted member or officer of the council;

11.2 Is, or has been within the past five years, a member, co-opted member or officer of a parish or town council within the council’s area; or

11.3 Is a relative or close friend of a person defined at paragraph 11.1 or 11.2 above. For this purpose, “relative” means –

11.1.1 Spouse or civil partner;

11.1.2 Living with the other person as husband and wife or as if they were civil partners;

11.1.3 Grandparent of the other person;

11.1.4 A lineal descendent of a grandparent of the other person;

11.1.5 A parent, sibling or child of a person defined at paragraphs 11.3.1 or 11.3.2;

11.1.6 A spouse or civil partner of a person defined at paragraphs 11.3.3, 11.3.4 or 11.3.5; or

11.1.7 Living with a person defined at paragraphs 11.3.3, 11.3.4 or 11.3.5 as husband and wife or as if they were civil partners

The council may, by resolution, agree to amend these arrangements and has delegated to the Chair of the referrals panel and the hearings panel the right to depart from these arrangements where he/she considers it is expedient to do so in order to secure the effective and fair consideration of any matter.

For the avoidance of doubt, members who have sat on the referrals panel are not precluded from sitting on a subsequent hearings panel called to determine the same complaint as considered by the referrals panel.

The monitoring officer will consult with the independent person and with you as complainant and seek to agree what you consider to be a fair resolution which also helps to ensure higher standards of conduct for the future. Such resolution may include the member accepting that his/her conduct was unacceptable and offering an apology, and/or other remedial action by the council. If the member complies with the suggested resolution, the monitoring officer will report the matter to the standards committee and the member’s council for information but will take no further action. However, if you tell the monitoring officer that any suggested resolution would not be adequate or the member concerned does not accept that the matter should be resolved in such a manner, the monitoring officer will refer the matter for a hearing before the hearings panel.